Category: \O\p\e\n\ \S\o\u\r\c\e (33 posts) /xwiki/resources/icons/silk/feed.png

Feb 02 2017

Jenkins GitHub Organization Jobs

The Jenkins Pipeline plugin includes a very nice feature which is the "GitHub Organization" job type. This job type will scan a given GitHub organization repositories for Jenkinsfile files and when found will automatically create a pipeline job for them.

This has some nice advantages:

  • You save your Jenkins job configuration in your SCM (git in our case, in the Jenkinsfile), next to your code. You can receive email diffs to show who made modifications to it, the reason and understand the changes.
  • It supports branches: when you create a branch it's automatically discovered by Jenkins and the build is executed on it. And if the branch gets removed, it's removed automatically from Jenkins too. This point is awesome for us since we used to have groovy script to execute to copy jobs when there were new branches and when branches were removed.

So we started exploring this for the XWiki project, starting with Contrib Extensions.

Here's a screenshot of our Github Organization job for XWiki Contrib:


And here's an example of a pipeline job executing:


Now if you implement this you'll quickly find that you want to share pipeline scripts between Jenkinsfile, in order to not have duplicates.

FYI here's what the Jenkinsfile for the syntax-markdown pipeline job shown above looks like:

xwikiModule {
    name = 'syntax-markdown'

Simple, isn't it? emoticon_smile The trick is that we've configured Jenkins to automatically load a Global Pipeline Library (implicit load). You can do that by saving libraries at the root of SCM repositories and configure Jenkins to load them from the SCM sources (see this Jenkins doc for more details).

So we've created this GitHub repository and we've coded a vars/xwikiModule.groovy file. At the moment of writing this is its content (I expect it to be improved a lot in the near future):

// Example usage:
//   xwikiModule {
//     name = 'application-faq'
//     goals = 'clean install' (default is 'clean deploy')
//     profiles = 'legacy,integration-tests,jetty,hsqldb,firefox' (default is 'quality,legacy,integration-tests')
//  }

def call(body) {
   // evaluate the body block, and collect configuration into the object
   def config = [:]
    body.resolveStrategy = Closure.DELEGATE_FIRST
    body.delegate = config

   // Now build, based on the configuration provided, using the followong configuration:
   // - the name of the module in git, e.g. "syntax-markdown"

    node {
       def mvnHome
       stage('Preparation') {
           // Get the Maven tool.
           // NOTE: Needs to be configured in the global configuration.
           mvnHome = tool 'Maven'
        stage('Build') {
            dir ( {
                checkout scm
               // Execute the XVNC plugin (useful for integration-tests)
               wrap([$class: 'Xvnc']) {
                    withEnv(["PATH+MAVEN=${mvnHome}/bin", 'MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx1024m']) {
                     try {
                         def goals = config.goals ?: 'clean deploy'
                         def profiles = config.profiles ?: 'quality,legacy,integration-tests'
                          sh "mvn ${goals} jacoco:report -P${profiles} -U -e -Dmaven.test.failure.ignore"
                          currentBuild.result = 'SUCCESS'
                     } catch (Exception err) {
                          currentBuild.result = 'FAILURE'
                         throw e
        stage('Post Build') {
           // Archive the generated artifacts
           archiveArtifacts artifacts: '**/target/*.jar', fingerprint: true
           // Save the JUnit test report
           junit testResults: '**/target/surefire-reports/TEST-*.xml'

def notifyByMail(String buildStatus) {
    buildStatus =  buildStatus ?: 'SUCCESSFUL'
   def subject = "${buildStatus}: Job '${env.JOB_NAME} [${env.BUILD_NUMBER}]'"
   def summary = "${subject} (${env.BUILD_URL})"
   def details = """<p>STARTED: Job '${env.JOB_NAME} [${env.BUILD_NUMBER}]':</p>
    <p>Check console output at &QUOT;<a href='${env.BUILD_URL}'>${env.JOB_NAME} [${env.BUILD_NUMBER}]</a>&QUOT;</p>"""

   def to = emailextrecipients([
           [$class: 'CulpritsRecipientProvider'],
           [$class: 'DevelopersRecipientProvider'],
           [$class: 'RequesterRecipientProvider']
   if (to != null && !to.isEmpty()) {
        mail to: to, subject: subject, body: details

Ideas of some next steps:

Right now there's one limitation I've found: It seems I need to manually click on "Re-scan Organization" in the Jenkins UI so that new Jenkinsfile added to repositories are taken into account. I hope that will get fixed soon. One workaround would be to add another Jenkins job to do that regularly but it's not perfect. Also note that you absolutely must authenticate against GitHub as otherwise you'll quickly reach the GitHub API request limit (when authenticated you are allowed 5000 requests per hour).

Anyway it's great and I love it.

May 03 2016

Bye Bye CLIRR, Welcome Revapi!

On the XWiki project it's been years that we've been checking automatically for backward compatibilities in our APIs as part of our build (It's even documented here).

Recently, we've moved to Java 8 for XWiki 8.1 and we've discovered that the tool we were using, CLIRR, doesn't work anymore with Java 8. So I searched, without much hope, for an alternative, and I was surprised (and delighted) to find that there are 2 valid solutions nowadays that support Java 8:

I've tried both and they both had issues. However, I've discovered that the maintainers or these 2 solutions were really cool guys and they very quickly fixed any issue I've raised. Big thanks to Lukas Krejci and Martin Mois, you're awesome guys! emoticon_smile

In the end the XWiki project has had to make a difficult choice and we chose Revapi (Some reasons mentioned here but honestly they're both valid choices).

So here's how we use it now:

  • In our top level POM:
           <!-- Used for checking backward compatibility (binary and source) -->
             <!-- Lock down plugin version for build reproducibility -->
                  "revapi": {
                    "java": {
                      "filter": {
                        "packages": {
                          "regex": true,
                          "include": ["org\\.xwiki\\..*"],
                          "exclude": ["org\\.xwiki\\..*\\.internal(\\..*)?", "org\\.xwiki\\..*\\.test(\\..*)?"]
  • Then in specific module POMs we override the configuration to add excludes (for backward and source incompatibilities that we know about and have voluntarily decided to do). For example:
                  "revapi": {
                    "java": {
                      "filter": {
                        "packages": {
                          "regex": true,
                          "include": ["org\\.xwiki\\..*"],
                          "exclude": ["org\\.xwiki\\..*\\.internal(\\..*)?", "org\\.xwiki\\..*\\.test(\\..*)?"]
                    "ignore": [
                        "code": "java.method.returnTypeTypeParametersChanged",
                        "old": "method java.util.List<? extends org.xwiki.extension.ExtensionDependency> org.xwiki.extension.AbstractExtension::getDependencies()",
                        "new": "method java.util.List<org.xwiki.extension.ExtensionDependency> org.xwiki.extension.AbstractExtension::getDependencies()",
                        "justification": "? return type makes signature more complex for nothing"
                        "code": "java.method.returnTypeTypeParametersChanged",
                        "old": "method java.util.Collection<? extends org.xwiki.extension.ExtensionDependency> org.xwiki.extension.Extension::getDependencies()",
                        "new": "method java.util.Collection<org.xwiki.extension.ExtensionDependency> org.xwiki.extension.Extension::getDependencies()",
                        "justification": "? return type makes signature more complex for nothing"
                        "code": "java.method.returnTypeTypeParametersChanged",
                        "old": "method java.util.Collection<? extends org.xwiki.extension.ExtensionDependency> org.xwiki.extension.wrap.WrappingExtension<E extends org.xwiki.extension.Extension>::getDependencies()",
                        "new": "method java.util.Collection<org.xwiki.extension.ExtensionDependency> org.xwiki.extension.wrap.WrappingExtension<E extends org.xwiki.extension.Extension>::getDependencies()",
                        "justification": "? return type makes signature more complex for nothing"
  • Now the interesting part is in generating reports. We've chosen an original way of doing this: We dynamically generate the Revapi report on our release notes wiki pages using Groovy. The big advantage is that there's no work to be done for the Release Manager:
    • Here's an example from the XWiki 8.1M1 Release Notes


    • The Groovy script below does the following:
      • Use the GitHub REST API to get the content of the pom.xml containing the Revapi excludes.
      • Parse the XML using Groovy
      • Display a report out of it
    • And here's the Groovy script packaged as a Wiki Macro for the curious ones:
      import groovy.json.*

      def getIgnores(def repo, def path)
       def url = "${repo}/contents/${path}".toURL().text
       def result = new JsonSlurper().parseText(url)
       def xml = new String(result.content.decodeBase64())
        result = new XmlSlurper().parseText(xml)
       def revapi ='**'.find { node ->
          node.artifactId.text() == 'revapi-maven-plugin'
       if (revapi) {
          result = new JsonSlurper().parseText(revapi.configuration.analysisConfiguration.text())
         return result.revapi.ignore
       } else {
         return ''

      def displayIgnores(def ignores)
        result = new JsonSlurper().parseText(ignores)
        result.each() {
          it.each() {
            println "* {{{${it.justification}}}}"
            println "** Violation type: {{code}}${it.code}{{/code}}"
            println "** Old: {{code}}${it.old}{{/code}}"
           if ( {
              println "** New: {{code}}${}{{/code}}"

      def getViolations(def version)
       def xobject = doc.getObject('ReleaseNotes.BackwardCompatibility')
       if (!xobject) {
          xobject = doc.newObject('ReleaseNotes.BackwardCompatibility')
         def commonsTag
         def renderingTag
         def platformTag
         if (version == 'master') {
            commonsTag = renderingTag = platformTag = 'master'
         } else {
            commonsTag = "xwiki-commons-${version}"
            renderingTag = "xwiki-rendering-${version}"
            platformTag = "xwiki-platform-${version}"
         def jsonCommons = getIgnores('xwiki-commons', "xwiki-commons-core/pom.xml?ref=${commonsTag}")
         def jsonRendering = getIgnores('xwiki-rendering', "pom.xml?ref=${renderingTag}")
         def jsonPlatform = getIgnores('xwiki-platform', "xwiki-platform-core/pom.xml?ref=${platformTag}")
          xobject.set('violations', JsonOutput.prettyPrint(JsonOutput.toJson([jsonCommons, jsonRendering, jsonPlatform])))
'Added backward-compatiblity violations data', true)
       return xobject.getProperty('violations').value


In conclusion we're very happy with the move, especially since we now have Java 8 support but also because Revapi provides more checks than what CLIRR was doing.

Jun 05 2015

Why is Jenkins's Incremental Build feature not working

On the XWiki project we have enabled Jenkins's Incremental Build feature:


This seemed like a nice feature to speed up our CI when building our Maven jobs. Alas, it doesn't work!

The problem is that from time to time you'll get build failure such as:

Caused by: org.sonatype.aether.transfer.ArtifactNotFoundException: Could not find artifact org.xwiki.platform:xwiki-platform-store:pom:6.4.4-SNAPSHOT in local.central (xxx)

You'd think it's not possible, especially as we use Maven's -U flag and thus, even if the artifact is not present in the local repository it should be downloaded from the Maven Remote Repository that we use (and it's available there!).

The reason is because of a Maven bug: MNG-5542. What happens is that the Incremental Build feature will use the -pl Maven parameter to list all the Maven projects to build and when this feature is used, artifacts declared in the <parent> section of your POMs are just ignored and not downloaded...

The consequence is that your build will fail from time to time when one artifact declared in one of your <parent> is not present in your local repository... If you have decided to have one Maven repository per Job in Jenkins - which would seem a good idea to isolate your jobs and to be able to use the Parallel build feature of Jenkins - then you'll hit the problem very frequently...

So in the end you have to choose between Parallel builds and Incremental builds but you cannot have both at the same time!

Note that even with Parallel builds turned off, you build will fail from time to time, just less frequently...

One solution for the XWiki project would be to break our big job that builds the Platform (over 100 modules located in the same Git repo that we release together under a single version) into 100 jobs. But doing this manually is a no go so we would need to script this or wait for some Jenkins dev to implement this idea...

Big pain!

Feb 26 2015

Custom JIRA Project Template

JIRA is a pain when you need to create lots of projects with custom Schemes. On the XWiki open source project we allow the community to contribute extensions and we offer a place to host the sources in the xwiki-contrib GitHub organization. We also offer for each project a JIRA project where users can report issues and where developers can track what they're working on. 

Thus we have the need to create lots of JIRA projects. Today, I got bored of repeating over and over the same setup for creating such projects. It involves 9 steps:

  1. Setting the category
  2. Setting the custom XWiki Workflow Scheme
  3. Setting the custom XWiki Screen Scheme
  4. Setting the custom XWiki Field Configuration Scheme
  5. Setting the custom XWiki Notifications Scheme
  6. Setting the custom XWiki Permission Scheme
  7. Setting the Project Lead
  8. Setting the project URL
  9. Setting some groups in one of the project's Roles

Following this tutorial (and a lots of googling emoticon_wink) I was able to automate steps 1-6 in the above list (Source code).

Now when we create a new JIRA project we get this nice template:


The main code doing the work is in

 * See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional
 * information regarding copyright ownership.
 * This is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
 * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as
 * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of
 * the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 * This software is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License along with this software; if not, write to the Free
 * Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA
 * 02110-1301 USA, or see the FSF site:

package org.xwiki.devtools.jira.template;

import java.util.Arrays;

import org.apache.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;

import com.atlassian.jira.bc.projectroles.ProjectRoleService;
import com.atlassian.jira.blueprint.api.AddProjectHook;
import com.atlassian.jira.blueprint.api.ConfigureData;
import com.atlassian.jira.blueprint.api.ConfigureResponse;
import com.atlassian.jira.blueprint.api.ValidateData;
import com.atlassian.jira.blueprint.api.ValidateResponse;
import com.atlassian.jira.component.ComponentAccessor;
import com.atlassian.jira.issue.fields.layout.field.FieldLayoutManager;
import com.atlassian.jira.issue.fields.layout.field.FieldLayoutScheme;
import com.atlassian.jira.issue.fields.screen.issuetype.IssueTypeScreenScheme;
import com.atlassian.jira.issue.fields.screen.issuetype.IssueTypeScreenSchemeManager;
import com.atlassian.jira.notification.NotificationSchemeManager;
import com.atlassian.jira.permission.PermissionSchemeManager;
import com.atlassian.jira.project.Project;
import com.atlassian.jira.project.ProjectCategory;
import com.atlassian.jira.project.ProjectManager;
import com.atlassian.jira.scheme.Scheme;
import com.atlassian.jira.util.SimpleErrorCollection;
import com.atlassian.jira.workflow.WorkflowSchemeManager;

public class XWikiAddProjectHook implements AddProjectHook
   private static final Logger LOGGER = LogManager.getLogger(XWikiAddProjectHook.class);

   public ValidateResponse validate(final ValidateData validateData)
       return ValidateResponse.create();

   public ConfigureResponse configure(final ConfigureData configureData)
        Project project = configureData.project();

       // Set Workflow Scheme
       WorkflowSchemeManager workflowSchemeManager = ComponentAccessor.getWorkflowSchemeManager();
        Scheme xwikiScheme = workflowSchemeManager.getSchemeObject("XWiki Workflow Scheme");
       if (xwikiScheme != null) {
            workflowSchemeManager.addSchemeToProject(project, xwikiScheme);
       } else {
            LOGGER.warn(String.format("[XWiki] Failed to find the \"XWiki Workflow Scheme\" scheme. "
               + "It is not set for the new project [%s]", project.getName()));

       // Set Notification Scheme
       NotificationSchemeManager notificationSchemeManager = ComponentAccessor.getNotificationSchemeManager();
        Scheme notificationScheme = notificationSchemeManager.getSchemeObject("XWiki Notification Scheme");
       if (notificationScheme != null) {
            notificationSchemeManager.addSchemeToProject(project, notificationScheme);
       } else {
            LOGGER.warn(String.format("[XWiki] Failed to find the \"XWiki Notification Scheme\" scheme. "
               + "It is not set for the new project [%s]", project.getName()));

       // Set Permission Scheme
       PermissionSchemeManager permissionSchemeManager = ComponentAccessor.getPermissionSchemeManager();
        Scheme permissionScheme = permissionSchemeManager.getSchemeObject("XWiki Open");
       if (permissionScheme != null) {
           // Remove all defined permissions screen since there can be only ony apparently
            permissionSchemeManager.addSchemeToProject(project, permissionScheme);
       } else {
            LOGGER.warn(String.format("[XWiki] Failed to find the \"XWiki Open\" scheme. "
               + "It is not set for the new project [%s]", project.getName()));

       // Set Project Category
       ProjectManager projectManager = ComponentAccessor.getProjectManager();
        ProjectCategory contribCategory = projectManager.getProjectCategoryObjectByName("XWiki Contributed Projects");
       if (contribCategory != null) {
            projectManager.setProjectCategory(project, contribCategory);
       } else {
            LOGGER.warn(String.format("[XWiki] Failed to find the \"XWiki Contributed Projects\" category. "
               + "It is not set for the new project [%s]", project.getName()));

       // Set Field Configuration Scheme
       FieldLayoutManager fieldLayoutManager = ComponentAccessor.getFieldLayoutManager();
       // Note: I couldn't find a way to get the Field Configuration Scheme by String so I'm iterating over all of them
       FieldLayoutScheme fieldLayoutScheme = null;
       for (FieldLayoutScheme scheme : fieldLayoutManager.getFieldLayoutSchemes()) {
           if (scheme.getName().equals("XWiki Open Field Configuration Scheme")) {
                fieldLayoutScheme = scheme;
       if (fieldLayoutScheme != null) {
            fieldLayoutManager.addSchemeAssociation(project, fieldLayoutScheme.getId());

       // Set Screen Scheme
       IssueTypeScreenSchemeManager issueTypeScreenSchemeManager = ComponentAccessor.getIssueTypeScreenSchemeManager();
       // Note: I couldn't find a way to get the Screen Scheme by String so I'm iterating over all of them
       IssueTypeScreenScheme screenScheme = null;
       for (IssueTypeScreenScheme scheme : issueTypeScreenSchemeManager.getIssueTypeScreenSchemes()) {
           if (scheme.getName().equals("Basic Issue Creation Scheme")) {
                screenScheme = scheme;
       if (screenScheme != null) {
            issueTypeScreenSchemeManager.addSchemeAssociation(project, screenScheme);
       } else {
            LOGGER.warn(String.format("[XWiki] Failed to find the \"Basic Issue Creation Scheme\" scheme. "
               + "It is not set for the new project [%s]", project.getName()));

       // Set project committers role to xwiki-committers and contrib-committers
       ProjectRoleService roleService = ComponentAccessor.getComponentOfType(ProjectRoleService.class);
        SimpleErrorCollection errorCollection = new SimpleErrorCollection();
        ProjectRole commmitterRole = roleService.getProjectRoleByName("Committers", errorCollection);
       // Make sure to remove any of the groups we wish to add to the Committers role as otherwise the addition fails
       roleService.removeActorsFromProjectRole(Arrays.asList("xwiki-committers", "contrib-committers"), commmitterRole,
            project, "atlassian-group-role-actor", errorCollection);
        roleService.addActorsToProjectRole(Arrays.asList("xwiki-committers", "contrib-committers"), commmitterRole,
            project, "atlassian-group-role-actor", errorCollection);

       return ConfigureResponse.create().setRedirect("/plugins/servlet/project-config/" + project.getKey()
           + "/summary");


Jan 27 2015

A strategy for maintaining backward compatibility

I'd like to explain what we do on the XWiki open source project to preserve backward compatibility of our Java APIs. We've done several iterations and we now have a process that is working quite well, even though there are still some issues but they're unavoidable with Java for the time being.

So here it goes:

  • We start by having a special package named internal and everything we put in there is considered implementation details and should never be used by users of our APIs. We're allowed to modify anything at any time in the internal package. For example: org.xwiki.instance.internal.*
  • We also use a Component-based approach, which forces us to separate interfaces (which are public) from implementation (which go in the internal package).
  • We have defined an advanced deprecation mechanism which allows us to move deprecated code that we no longer use to legacy maven module (using Aspects with AspectJ) that can be optionally installed at runtime, and which we never use at build time. This prevents us from using any deprecated legacy code and it allows us to push away the cruft under the carpet emoticon_wink (without breaking backward compatibility!)
  • We have the notion of "Young API" (a.k.a Unstable APIs) and when a new API is introduced, the developer can (and should) use the @Unstable annotation to signify to users that this API is unstable for the moment and can change at any time. We only allow an API to remain unstable for a full development cycle. We've recently introduced a custom Checkstyle check that enforces this!
  • Last, we use the Maven CLIRR plugin to make sure we never break an API unintentionally (it fails our build). This allows us to only carefully and intentionally break our APIs. It also allows to us to mention what we break in our Release Notes (example).

The important point IMO is that we have automated tools to ensure that our strategy is applied, namely:

  • Our Unstable Annotation Checker (a custom checkstyle rule)

This is working pretty well for us even though we do break backward compatibility from time to time, when we judge that the code touched is unlikely to be used and working around the breakage would be too complex and would take too much time (for example adding a method in an interface requires writing a new interface and modifying all code accepting that interface). Luckily this is going to be made somewhat simpler in Java in the future with Default Methods (introduced in Java 8). It won't fit all cases though.

Another example of backward compatibility aspect that we don't handle is when someone changes what an API returns or what a API does. A simple example is if a method returns an object of type X but the implementation changes to return another implementation of type X that behaves differently... This is a tough one to detect and prevent.

WDYT? Are you doing something else in your projects? (I'd be curious of ways to improve even further what we do!).

Sep 11 2014

Atlassian Summit 2014

I've noticed that Atlassian was holding a Summit yesterday. Apparently it was a success with 2100 attendees. That's great to see and I wanted to congratulate them on that!.

As a developer on the XWiki project what sparked my interest were the announcements related to Confluence. Although I haven't viewed the video yet (it wasn't posted when I checked), I've gathered the following from tweets and blog posts I've noticed:

  • New File Collaboration:

     "You’ll be able to share files through Confluence and collaborate on them in much the same way you already do with pages, using @mentions and in-line comments.

  • Real time collaborative editing:

     And it’s not uncommon for two or more people to need to make updates to the same page at the same time. That’s why we’re bringing real-time collaborative editing to Confluence. (yes!) Timeframe for delivery is a bit nebulous at this point, but the dev team is already plugging away on it

  • Inline comments on highlighted text:

     Oh, and in-line commenting? Yeah, that’s coming to Confluence pages in 5.7, too.

These are all very nice features. Actually they're so nice that the XWiki project has been working on them for some time too, some being there for years and some being more recent. So here's how XWiki would compare on those features:

  • File Collaboration. We have a very nice File Manager allowing users to easily import lots of files inside XWiki, manage them inside the wiki. You can comment on files, tag them, add wiki content related to the files, and more.

  • Real time collaboration. We have been working on years on real time collaboration in partnership with Academia (INRIA to be precise). We wanted to have realtime for both the Wiki editor and also the WYSIWYG editor. We've tested various solutions and in the end we've found some algorithms that seem to work well. Thus we now have 2 extensions for Real time:
  • Inline comments. XWiki has had support for Annotations for years now (4 years to be precise), allowing users to select text and put an annotation on that text. You can even reply to annotations and they are resilient to reasonable changes from the highlighted content!

IMO this shows several things:

  • The open source XWiki project is keeping its innovation rate and is still ahead in term of features
  • A small team can do miracles (the XWiki dev team is much smaller than the Confluence one)

Go XWiki, go! emoticon_smile

May 15 2014

Internals of an open source company: XWiki SAS

I had the pleasure to present at Human Talks. I presented how an open source company works internally and the challenges of handling potentially conflicting interests between business interests and open source interests. My experience is based on the XWiki SAS company and the XWiki open source project.

It was a fun event, held at Mozilla Paris in a very nice room (fun fact: on this picture, which was taken on the day Mozilla opened the office, you can see Ludovic Dubost - with the blue polo -, creator of the XWiki open source project and founder of the XWiki SAS company emoticon_wink).

Thanks Human Talks for the invite!

Feb 04 2014


Another year @ FOSDEM with the XWiki gang: Ludovic, Marius, Anca, Oana and Fabio!

This year though we succeeded in getting dev room (yeah!), a wiki dev room, that I co-organized with Quim Gil from Wikimedia and Jean-Macr Libs from

The XWiki project was lucky to have 6 talks:

It was a nice FOSDEM. We enjoyed Belgian waffles and French fries as usual (although I heard some enjoyed it a bit less than usual since they were on a low-carb diet emoticon_wink).

At the content level, the conference was slightly too low-tech for me, a Java developer. Lots of C/C++ guys and lots of stuff close to the hardware emoticon_wink Not that I don't think it's nice to do that, but rather that I can't participate much. There were some other tracks more of interest to me like the Java dev room (but I was stuck in the wiki dev room at the same time so couldn't join) and the Javascript dev room but this one was so full that it was near impossible to get in...

I'd personally love to see some more room/space given to open source in businesses for the future editions of FOSDEM.

With over 8000 participants it seems it was, once again, a very successful FOSDEM.

See you next year maybe!

Jan 27 2014

Calling a Maven plugin from another plugin

Normally you're not supposed to call a Maven plugin's mojo from another mojo but it may happen times when you have this need. In my case I've developed a plugin and I needed to call the Maven License Plugin from within my mojo.

I succeeded in achieving this through the Maven Executor plugin.

Without further ado here's the code that worked for me:

* @requiresProject
* @requiresDependencyResolution compile
* @threadSafe
public class FormatMojo extends AbstractVerifyMojo
     * The project currently being build.
     * @parameter expression="${project}"
     * @required
     * @readonly

   private MavenProject mavenProject;

     * The current Maven session.
     * @parameter expression="${session}"
     * @required
     * @readonly

   private MavenSession mavenSession;

     * The Maven BuildPluginManager component.
     * @component
     * @required

   private BuildPluginManager pluginManager;


   public void execute() throws MojoExecutionException, MojoFailureException
       // I needed to add a plugin dependency where my license.txt file is located.
       Dependency dep = new Dependency();

        Plugin licensePlugin = plugin(

                element(name("header"), "license.txt"),
                element(name("strictCheck"), "true"),
                    element(name("headerDefinition"), "license-xml-definition.xml")),
                    element(name("include"), "src/main/resources/**/*.xml"))


And boom it worked! emoticon_smile

Hope this can be useful to someone.

Sep 25 2013

Debugging the Maven Deploy Plugin, sort of

You may have been hit by some error while calling mvn deploy and found unable to debug the issue. For example a common error you can get is "Cannot connect. Reason: Auth fail".

The problem is that the Deploy plugin doesn't offer any debugging option. Researching the topic you'll find that it actually uses the JSCH library and researching how to debug this library you'll discover that it provides its own logging facade interface and doesn't provide any logging implementation, leaving it to the user to implement its interface to get any log.

Thanks this blog post I found a SLF4J implementation of the JSCH logging interface and added it to the wagon-ssh artifact.

In short to get debug logs, do the following:

  • Install this version of wagon-ssh in your local repository using this POM file, as follows:
    mvn install:install-file -Dfile=wagon-ssh-2.6-20130924-debug.jar -DpomFile=pom.xml
  • Force using this Wagon SSH modified version by modifying your project's POM to add:

Now when you do a mvn deploy you'll get debug logs such as:

[INFO] --- maven-deploy-plugin:2.7:deploy (default-deploy) @ xxx ---
Downloading: scp://xxx
19:03:00.666 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Connecting to xxx port 22
19:03:00.717 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Connection established
19:03:00.760 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Remote version string: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.6
19:03:00.760 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Local version string: SSH-2.0-JSCH-0.1.44
19:03:00.760 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - CheckCiphers: aes256-xxx
19:03:00.873 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - SSH_MSG_KEXINIT sent
19:03:00.874 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - SSH_MSG_KEXINIT received
19:03:00.874 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - kex: server->client aes128-xxx
19:03:00.874 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - kex: client->server aes128-xxx
19:03:00.884 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - SSH_MSG_KEXDH_INIT sent
19:03:00.884 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - expecting SSH_MSG_KEXDH_REPLY
19:03:00.938 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - ssh_rsa_verify: signature true
19:03:00.939 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Host 'xxx' is known and mathces the RSA host key
19:03:00.939 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
19:03:00.939 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS received
19:03:00.940 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - SSH_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent
19:03:00.999 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - SSH_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
19:03:01.055 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive,password
19:03:01.055 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Next authentication method: publickey
19:03:01.107 [pool-3-thread-1] INFO  com.jcraft.jsch - Disconnecting from xxx port 22
[WARNING] Could not transfer metadata xxx from/to xxx): Cannot connect. Reason: Auth fail

Unfortunately, as you can see, it doesn't really add a lot of information to help you debug the real issue. In this case I had just modified my username to be a wrong one and I don't see how I can guess this from this log... 

I'm just reporting this in case it helps someone emoticon_smile

Note that a better solution is to check the SSH logs on the server side. In my case when I had the problem I got the following:

Sep 25 14:55:54 xxx sshd[801]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for xxx [xxxx] failed - POSSIBLE BREAK-IN ATTEMPT!

This means that the PTR of that IP must match the hostname.

Strangely it worked fine when using SSH directly. I'm assuming this is because this message is a warning and the standard SSH client continue whereas JSCH chokes on it and stops.

Created by Vincent Massol on 2008/12/18 22:51
This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 license